{"id":542,"date":"2005-12-09T08:54:54","date_gmt":"2005-12-09T08:54:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/127.0.0.1\/wordpress179\/?p=542"},"modified":"2005-12-09T08:54:54","modified_gmt":"2005-12-09T08:54:54","slug":"observation-uk-vs-oz-penguin-vs-tim-tam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thehippy.net\/blog\/observation-uk-vs-oz-penguin-vs-tim-tam\/","title":{"rendered":"Observation: UK vs. Oz – Penguin vs. Tim Tam"},"content":{"rendered":"
TIM TAMS – NO CONTEST!<\/b><\/p>\n
Penguins<\/a> are like the cheapass, home-brand version of TimTams<\/a>. They just can’t compete. <\/p>\n You can eat them, if that’s all you’ve got, but you’ll be thinking about Tim Tams<\/a>.<\/p>\n Tim-Tams<\/a> have thicker, nicer chocolate, softer and nicer biscuit and a superior filling.<\/p>\n Sheila says: “Penguin is a wannabe TimTam! The biscuit is dry, brittle and cheap and the chocolate is not as thick and creamy. The filling tastes like sugar and cocoa – far inferior to [a] Tam Tam’s filling.<\/i>“<\/p>\n Oz wins, hands down. Bring TimTams<\/a> to the UK!<\/p>\n From www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n “the mighty Penguin offers a more of a satisfying mouthful and its greater bulk elevates it from treat to a snack.<\/i>“<\/p>\n So, they are giving it credit for being heavier?! Obviously they’ve never heard the expression “quality, not quantity”! Fools.<\/p>\n More opinions can be found here<\/a>, but these freaks eat Tim Tams with tea<\/b> so they are obviously idiots. \ud83d\ude1b<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" TIM TAMS – NO CONTEST! Penguins are like the cheapass, home-brand version of TimTams. They just can’t compete. You can eat them, if that’s all you’ve got, but you’ll be thinking about Tim Tams. Tim-Tams have thicker, nicer chocolate, softer … Continue reading